Algorithm for Diagnosing and Treating Hypertriglyceridemia
Algorithm for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia that defines criteria for starting pharmacological treatment.
Algorithm for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia that defines criteria for starting pharmacological treatment.
Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in acute care, associated with palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain, or decompensated heart failure. Diagnosis should begin with ECG confirmation and a detailed clinical history, assessing symptom duration, medications, comorbidities, and red flags, as well as screening for reversible causes (electrolyte or acid–base disturbances, infection, hyperthyroidism, alcohol/stimulants).
This algorithm proposes a structured approach to atrial fibrillation, defining criteria for hemodynamic instability, guiding the choice between rhythm and rate control, and indicating when to anticoagulate. It helps identify patients who warrant further work-up and urgent intervention, optimizing resources and avoiding unnecessary procedures.
Podcast transcript
Patient with tachycardia and suspected atrial fibrillation. The first step is to confirm the diagnosis with a 12-lead ECG. Once AF is confirmed, define the treatment strategy, starting with the identification of reversible secondary causes.
Screen for electrolyte or acid–base disturbances, pericarditis, myocarditis, hyperthyroidism, sepsis, anaemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, hypothermia, or drug toxicity. Also consider decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and hypovolaemia. If any cause is identified, treat the underlying condition.
If no reversible cause is found, the therapeutic decision centres on rhythm vs rate control. First, assess hemodynamic stability. Instability presents with systolic BP < 90 mmHg associated with altered mental status, chest pain, dyspnoea, or presyncope/syncope. Other red flags include acute ischaemia with ST-segment changes, elevated cardiac biomarkers, or decompensated heart failure.
If the patient is hemodynamically unstable, request specialist support. Do the same when an accessory pathway is suspected—e.g., wide, bizarre, or polymorphic QRS complexes; history of Wolff–Parkinson–White; or a delta wave on prior ECGs.
In stable patients, choose between rhythm and rate control. Rate control is generally favoured in patients >65 years, with hypertension, without heart failure, those preferring this approach, refractory to prior antiarrhythmics, or minimally symptomatic. Rhythm control can be considered when significant symptoms persist despite adequate rate control.
The decision to perform pharmacological or electrical cardioversion depends on AF duration. If <48 hours, cardioversion can be considered directly. If >48 hours or unknown, a minimum of 3 weeks of effective anticoagulation is required, or alternatively, a transoesophageal echocardiogram to exclude intracardiac thrombus. Recent stroke/TIA, peripheral thromboembolism, mechanical valve, or rheumatic heart disease contraindicate immediate cardioversion without prior anticoagulation.
If rhythm control is chosen and no exclusion criteria are present (second/third-degree AV block, prolonged QT, hypokalaemia, pregnancy, or severe renal/hepatic impairment), antiarrhythmics such as amiodarone, flecainide, propafenone, or sotalol may be used. In structural, ischaemic, or valvular heart disease, or with LV hypertrophy, avoid flecainide and propafenone; prefer amiodarone or sotalol. In heart failure, amiodarone is usually the drug of choice.
When opting for rate control, selection depends on left-ventricular ejection fraction. If LVEF <40%, use low-dose beta-blockers (e.g., metoprolol) and consider adding digoxin. With preserved LVEF, beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (diltiazem or verapamil), or digoxin can be used alone or in combination.
After initial control, start maintenance therapy (rhythm or rate) according to the chosen strategy. In all cases, assess thromboembolic risk and the need for long-term anticoagulation based on the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.
Therapy should be individualised, considering symptoms, comorbidities, contraindications, and the patient’s informed preference. Ensure an appropriate follow-up plan after discharge.
Related algorithms
Clinical cases
Male, 45, no relevant history, palpitations for 12 hours. ECG: atrial fibrillation, HR 140 bpm, no signs of ischaemia. BP 125/75 mmHg, no dyspnoea, no HF. No prior anticoagulation. What is the most appropriate next step?
Female, 28, rapid irregular palpitations; ECG: irregular tachyarrhythmia with variable wide QRS; prior records show a delta wave. Haemodynamically stable. What is the best initial therapeutic option?
Male, 72, with hypertension and diabetes (CHA₂DS₂-VASc = 3), intermittent palpitations for “several days,” no precise record. ECG: AF, HR 110 bpm; stable. What is the correct approach before elective cardioversion?
FAQ
Authorship and updates
Filipe Cerca, MD
To access the content, you must log in to the platform.
2024 ESC Guidelines para a abordagem da fibrilhação auricular (página oficial ESC).
Van Gelder IC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J.
AHA Clinical Update – 2023 AF Guideline (slide set de síntese).
NICE NG196 (2021): Atrial fibrillation – diagnosis and management.
Sakthivel R, et al. Atrial fibrillation and pre-excitation: risks e manejo (FA com via acessória).